AKIPS
★★★★★ 5.0 · 1 Review
What is AKIPS?
AKIPS is the most scalable, fully featured network monitoring system, available at a commodity price. Purpose built for a virtual machine. In a single VM, it scales several orders of magnitude larger than all other vendors that require the purchase of expensive dedicated hardware to run on.
Alternatives to AKIPS
NinjaOneSpotlightNinjaOne automates the hardest parts of IT, empowering more than 20,000 IT teams with visibility, security, and control over all… Learn more about NinjaOne.
ManageEngine Site24x7Spotlight
GlassWireGlassWire is a leading network security monitor and firewall solution, designed to empower users with unparalleled visibility… Learn more about GlassWire.
MotadataMotadata is an IT monitoring and management software that derives business insights through real-time processing, correlation… Learn more about Motadata.
Ossisto 365Ossisto 365 is an Ossisto venture, wherein our team of IT experts have devised exceptional IT system health check tools for IT… Learn more about Ossisto 365.
NetFlow LogicNetFlow Logic Corp. creates ultra-performance, scalable in-line analytics software for optimization and cyber security of… Learn more about NetFlow Logic.
OsmonetOsmonet helps customers take automated reactive measures to maintaining their assets. As a systems integrator we understand… Learn more about Osmonet.
PathSolutionsPathSolutions’ Total Network Visibility™ solutions represent a new paradigm in network performance monitoring software by… Learn more about PathSolutions.
AfinetySince 1986, Afinety has been providing full range of IT services for law firms. Specializing cloud network design… Learn more about Afinety.
Arrcus, Inc.Arrcus was founded to enrich human experiences by interconnecting people, machines, and data. Our mission is to provide… Learn more about Arrcus, Inc..
AKIPS Reviews (1)
- ★★★★★1
- ★★★★★0
- ★★★★★0
- ★★★★★0
- ★★★★★0
Review Summary
Generated using AI from real user reviews
AKIPS delivers strong value for mid-sized deployments, especially in cost-sensitive environments. A university user running the platform for five years reports that it performs reliably at scale and costs significantly less than comparable dedicated-hardware alternatives, which matters substantially for non-profit budgets.
The main friction points center on edge-case configuration. Custom alerting thresholds for unusual devices—older building-management controllers and legacy AV equipment—require manual tuning beyond what the documentation covers. Device fingerprinting for these non-standard assets sometimes sends users to forums or support email rather than self-service guides. Support itself is knowledgeable and responsive, but replies to obscure questions can take a day or two. Data export into formats suited for grants reporting also needed initial setup work.
For straightforward monitoring environments, the product appears solid. For deployments with older or non-standard hardware, expect configuration effort and support interaction during setup. The value proposition remains strong if you have the time to handle those details or a responsive support relationship in place.
★★★★★
Saturday, March 28, 2026
“Five years of running AKIPS across a mid-sized university campus…”
Five years of running AKIPS across a mid-sized university campus will teach you where the edges are. And honestly? Even after all that time hunting for cracks, what strikes me most is how few genuinely painful ones exist. The product does what it promises at a scale that would cost three times as much with any dedicated-hardware vendor. For a non-profit education environment where the budget conversation never gets easier, that matters more than almost anything else.
That said, let me be useful about the limitations I did run into. Custom alerting thresholds for unusual device classes, think older building-management controllers and some legacy AV gear, took real effort to get right. The documentation covers the common cases well, but edge-case device fingerprinting occasionally left me digging through forums or emailing support directly. Speaking of support, they are genuinely responsive and clearly know the product deeply, but turnaround on the more obscure questions could stretch to a day or two. Not a crisis, just something to plan around. The reporting UI for exporting data into formats our grants office could actually use also required some coaxing early on.
None of those frustrations are dealbreakers, and most of them shrink the longer you live with the platform. The polling performance at high device counts is still something I brag about to colleagues at peer institutions. If you are managing a sprawling campus network on a tight budget and you need something that can actually keep up, this is the one to look at seriously. I have no plans to leave.